Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you have actually safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as property owners and genuine estate business as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurer whose prejudiced practices make housing unavailable to individuals since of:
race or color.
religion.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises a problem of public importance. Where force or risk of force is used to reject or hinder fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for managing specific grievances of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of an illegal housing practice, might submit a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of people based upon recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by giving incorrect details about accessibility of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was readily available or guiding homeseekers to specific areas based upon race. Individuals who get such false details or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought many cases alleging this sort of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to uncover this kind of covert discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based upon race or color. A few of the Department's cases have also declared that municipalities and other local federal government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they denied permits or zoning changes for housing developments, or relegated them to predominantly minority communities, due to the fact that the prospective homeowners were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This restriction covers circumstances of obvious discrimination versus members of a specific religion as well less direct actions, such as zoning regulations created to restrict the use of personal homes as a places of praise. The number of cases submitted because 1968 declaring spiritual discrimination is little in comparison to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does contain a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a religious organization to reserve such housing to persons of the exact same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with minimal housing alternatives, often have little recourse but to tolerate the humiliation and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or risk having their households and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at proprietors who develop an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from tenants or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to acquire relief for renters who have actually been treated unfairly by a property manager due to the fact that of sex and likewise hinder other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing repercussions. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage lending may likewise negatively impact women, particularly minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his/her forefathers stem. Census data suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action against municipal governments that have tried to decrease or restrict the variety of Hispanic households that might live in their neighborhoods. We have actually sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has also sued loan providers for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually taken action versus personal property owners who have discriminated against such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus families with children under 18. In addition to forbiding an outright denial of housing to households with kids, the Act also prevents housing companies from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on renters with custody of kids. For instance, landlords may not locate households with kids in any single part of a complex, position an unreasonable constraint on the total number of persons who may reside in a house, or restrict their access to recreational services supplied to other tenants. In most instances, the changed Fair Housing Act forbids a housing supplier from declining to rent or sell to families with children. However, some facilities might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually released policies and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act defines individuals with a special needs to mean those people with psychological or physical problems that considerably restrict one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment might consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing disability, movement impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, chronic tiredness, learning special needs, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity may consist of seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise secures persons who have a record of such a problems, or are considered as having such a problems. Current users of unlawful regulated substances, individuals convicted for prohibited manufacture or circulation of a controlled compound, sex transgressors, and juvenile culprits are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no protections to individuals with or without specials needs who provide a direct risk to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct danger needs to be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's securities for individuals with impairments has actually concentrated on two major areas. One is insuring that zoning and other policies worrying land use are not used to impede the residential options of these individuals, consisting of unnecessarily restricting common, or gather together, residential plans, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that newly constructed multifamily housing is developed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is accessible to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with impairments may cohabit in congregate living plans, often referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land use choices or carrying out land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against people with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land usage policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with impairments or a specific kind of special needs, such as psychological health problem, from finding in a specific area, while enabling other groups of unassociated people to cohabit because location.
- To take action versus, or deny an authorization, for a home due to the fact that of the disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building permit for a home because it was intended to offer housing for individuals with mental retardation.
- To refuse to clear up lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings might be essential to afford persons or groups of persons with disabilities a level playing field to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes a sensible lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are affordable. If a requested modification enforces an undue monetary or administrative problem on a city government, or if an adjustment develops a fundamental modification in a city government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "affordable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against persons with impairments to consist of a failure "to create and build" specific brand-new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and usable by persons with specials needs, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all freshly constructed multi-family houses of 4 or more systems meant for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an accessible entryway on an available path, accessible common and public usage areas, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available area, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
Developers, home builders, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held accountable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these style requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought many enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have actually been solved by consent decrees supplying a range of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building requirements) that will attend to making other housing systems accessible; training on the availability requirements for those included in the building procedure; a required that all new housing projects abide by the accessibility requirements, and financial relief for those hurt by the violations. In addition, the Department has looked for to promote accessibility through building codes.
